While it is not recommended on its own, it can work in conjunction with other frameworks. It gives great support for a wide variety of operating systems. That being said, it can work as a tool for developing apps in conjunction with other frameworks. It is owned by MIT. It provides excellent features for a low code development platform and deserves its place among other frameworks. It provides existing tools to the developers who can use it to create efficient apps for their businesses. It is one of the best in the market for creating an AR based app. Why bother with creating with app frameworks when you can create efficient apps without a single of coding!
Try Appy Pie today! In fact, a survey by professional services firm Clutch found that 42 percent of small- and medium-sized businesses utilize a mobile app. An additional 30 percent of those businesses surveyed had plans to build an app in the future. However, that same survey showed no increase, year-over-year, in the number of businesses that actually had a mobile app. You need to not only have a great idea that will be attractive to your customers, but you have to be able to translate that idea into code and create a working app.
This guide will take you through the reasons why you should consider becoming a mobile app reseller and how to get started with this profitable venture. If all these businesses had an affordable, experienced mobile app reseller to work with, they may be able to get their projects off the ground faster, helping their businesses grow.
And as a marketing agency that helps small- to medium-sized businesses, offering mobile app creation as an upsell seems like a great idea. Learning to code on your own is tricky, too, because becoming good at developing mobile apps takes time. Rather than leave a potentially lucrative income stream on the table, or spend lots of money in the hopes that something pans out, you can become a mobile app reseller to take advantage of the market.
Other professionals in the industry, such as Peter Mezyk of mobile app developer Nomtek, agree. Telling a potential customer success stories of how apps have worked for other businesses — showing them actual, quantifiable results — is a great way to increase your revenue through your app reseller business. Their mobile app increased user retention and loyalty, leading to better revenues.
Happy employees are more likely to take fewer sick days, be more productive, and stay with your company longer, creating an all-around better situation for your business. Adding mobile app reselling to your slate of offered services helps protect your business from dips in the market. The more products or services you offer, the less likely you are to be negatively impacted if demand for one of your services dips a little.
Often, when businesses develop mobile apps, they incur all the cost and headache of creating the app themselves. This makes app development out of reach for many small businesses and agencies wishing to provide mobile apps as a service to their clients. By becoming a mobile app reseller, however, you partner with a business, such as Appy Pie that already knows and offers the technology you need. You talk with your client about their individual needs, log into your account with your mobile app agency, and select the features and technology you need.
The app is then sold to your client with your branding and information, making it look as if you did all the hard work! Some mobile app resellers choose to maintain the branding of their partner companies, using it as a selling point to their potential clients. The market is full of companies offering white label app services, so finding the one that fits your needs best may take some research. You are in the app reseller business to make money, right? To make this happen, you need to be sure the pricing structure of your partner supports your business model and the ability to scale as time goes on.
Many white label services are structured to accept monthly payments for use of their platform, but some offer discounts if you pay in larger lump sums. Think about your current clientele and the market you want to target with your app reseller business.
Will you need the ability to create an app that allows event reservations? Or do you just want to work with local businesses offering loyalty points for each purchase? Once an app is developed, it has to be submitted to both the Apple and Play stores. Some white label companies allow you to submit your apps through their own developer accounts, but others require that you have your own account. Providing high-quality products and services to your clients at the most affordable prices is important to the overall health of your business.
With Appy Pie , you can add mobile app reselling to your list of services with no time spent learning to code. We offer white label mobile app services, completely customizable to meet your needs and your branding. Choose your plan level in affordable monthly or annual payments, login, and get started creating apps. Check it out today! AR enhances the real-world environment by using various sensory modalities like vision, voice, smell, etc.
AR devices have been around since the late 80s. Despite that, augmented reality is a relatively new field with just about anything possible for it in the coming years. Augmented reality is currently being implemented by the smartphone industry in significant numbers. App makers create AR experiences by using various features of a smartphone and deliver an integrated user experience that emulates the experience of using an actual AR device.
Augmented reality is a revolutionary technology and the truth is that it does not need smartphones to thrive. On the other hand, it does not have a place to implement its true potential. Dedicated AR devices exist but they are not mass-produced because of production costs, lack of awareness among consumers, potential security risks and a plethora of other reasons. The best example of an AR device is Google Glass.
Its adoption in the popular consumer market was a failure due to a lack of need and its privacy risks. The potential risk that anyone with access to your glass could have seen everything you would do dissuaded even the most enthusiastic techies of the time. Google Glass, however, second winded and is already being extensively used in closed IoT ecosystems, especially in manufacturing, the health industry, and logistics.
Google Glass proved why the general consumer market is not ready for AR devices. A market that is barely warming up to virtual reality consoles is far away from adopting AR extensively. It is safe to assume that in the worst-case scenario, the smartphone market will remain at its current saturation point for the next decade. The chances of smartphones becoming obsolete are high but there is also an equal chance that smartphones have become the definitive AR device themselves.
Smartphones already work as AR devices with the help of AR compatibility. Unfortunately, smartphones do not live up to the actual potential of augmented reality devices and are relatively basic. Nonetheless, the coming decade will be over-flooded with smartphone configurations that have AR capabilities and heavy AR apps will soon become the norm. The next years should determine if it comes true.
Banter aside, the probability of smartphones being AR devices increases as each day goes by. The promise of handheld AR devices has been coming for a long time with no real proof of its existence. For now, smartphones are still the best way to go. There is a gradually increasing need for AR apps and new app market leaders will pop up.
The potential for AR is endless. App makers are slowly discovering new applications for augmented reality and making apps. The most extensive application of AR is in the entertainment app markets. SnapChat is still the best AR camera that exists on the market by a long shot. Apps like Skymap are revolutionary for their respective fields. Developed by Google, this app lets you point your camera to the sky and identifies star configurations and helps identify constellations in the night sky. Apps like InkHunter let you see how a tattoo will look on your body before you tattoo it to your body.
Consumer technology is showing a trend of slowing down. Smartphones have become the norm of computing and the most efficient smartphones are stuck with no significant innovations for the market. As discussed above, many manufacturers are looking at the potential of smartphones as AR and AI devices. With the increase in AR capability, more AR apps will be required. This USP has reached its maximum potential.
There is no way to make a smartphone more convenient. With IoT, apps and compatible hardware, everything that can be done through apps is already being done. The best phones in the market are in no way utilizing the true potential of their hardware. Unlike computer software, mobile apps work on most hardware configurations. This makes better-engineered hardware worthless. The only way a smartphone can live up to its price point is with software that actually challenges its hardware capability.
The device list for AR compatible devices has been steadily increasing. Many flagship models are generally AR compatible. AR capability and its utilization will actually add value to expensive flagships and add luxury to the hardware upgrade the more expensive smartphones provide. Thus app makers and phone makers themselves will stress on better AR apps in the near future.
All usable AR apps have appealed to users raising confidence and increasing the potential demand for AR devices. AR advancements are making graphics better, proven by the Animoji feature of iPhones. There is also a rise of companies investing in smartphone-based AR compatible software. This is often looked down upon due to security concerns and the mixed reception towards AI but is actually an important application of both. From a business standpoint, AR makes it easy for AI to predict trends, generate leads and gain customers.
Providing an AR experience is already being used by retailers. ARCore was initially launched by Google in March It is a development kit dedicated to making AR-based apps for smartphones. The stable version of ARCore was released on 30 July While not the first platform that will aid in making AR apps, it is definitely the best. Since it is made with Google themselves, it will blend with Android more seamlessly than software like Unity, and Unreal Engine. Both industry giants investing in AR is a clear sign of shifting trends towards AR apps in the smartphone markets.
Looking at the Smartphone industry from a purely business perspective, AR happens to be one of the safest bets out there.
The chaos that was the smartphone industry is now settling. Smartphones have now become replaceable pieces of plastic or metal which get a new skin each year. This is proven by the fact that each year a new flagship is launched, which rarely justifies its price tag.
Flagships fail on both hardware and software fronts presenting a simple cosmetic update to the otherwise normal phone. Industry standards have been set and profit through rapid innovation is no longer a feasible strategy for both phones and apps. For innovation-based profits, AR is the only way to go and is a safe investment for the next decade. There is no denying that AR happens to be the future of mobile applications.
Unfortunately, there is a slight chance that this evolutionary leap to AR might never happen. AR suffers from its wide disadvantages. The greatest disadvantage of AR is the potential breach of the privacy of millions of people making app makers reluctant to innovate in it. These disadvantages are somewhat negated by the smartphone industry.
The future of mobile apps is not far. One could say that we are currently living that future. We shall see in some time if AR successfully replaces and integrates with traditional mobile apps effectively. AR apps are the way to go!
Did you know you can create your own AI apps with Appy Pie? Learn more. App testing is often an underrated field in the app development process.
Testing is a very time-consuming activity and there are hardly any ways to cut down time spent on testing. Testing will depend on the nature of the app, the systems it is designed for and the nature of its execution. Hence, testing software is more hard work than what we give it credit for. The smartphone industry has made software testing harder.
Originally, testing was done for computer software. Computer specifications have changed gradually meaning that one specific system could be used for multiple years for testing purposes. If there was a requirement for a better system, you could simply modify the existing testing rig. The smartphone industry has grown aggressively and exponentially. Smartphones come in a lot of configurations and setups. There are no industry standards for anything except maybe the headphone jack in a smartphone. Everything from the phone screen to the internal OS is highly modifiable and smartphone makers have an excellent plethora of systems to choose from.
Although Apple is a lot more standardized, Android being open source allows a lot of brands to take their own operating systems with the android base. This makes app testing a difficult job. There are three approaches to app testing. Testing is either done with a real device or with the help of a simulator or emulator. Real device testing is difficult in the smartphone industry. The sheer number and varieties of smartphone configurations dissuade real-device testing. Real device testing is also very expensive and designing apps for particular android configurations is wasteful.
The industry therefore has furthered and championed the cause of simulators and emulators. Simulators and emulators have existed for a long time. They have been fairly common in industries like automobile, aviation, etc. Both emulators and simulators do the same job. They recreate the experience of a real device in a virtual setting. Simulators and emulators perform a similar task but there are slight fundamental differences between the two. Simulators tend to mimic the usual internal behavior of a device.
A simulator does not take into consideration the hardware of a device. Simulations are accurate under perfect conditions in an ideal environment. Whereas, emulators emulate the experience of a device. What this means is that an emulator will mimic the device software, hardware and the operating system of the actual device. When compared to emulators, simulators usually fall short. Despite that simulators have certain advantages over emulators.
For example, a calculator app can make do with simple simulated testing. Emulators in such a case would be overkill. Emulators are a better option when the app involved uses extensive hardware and features of the real device. For example, an app like Snapchat uses the camera, geo-location, sound systems, a significant amount of RAM and processor to be able to accurately perform its various tasks. Emulators tend to be easier to debug. With an emulator, it is easy to point out where the problems are. The greatest feature about emulators is that it is often provided by the manufacturers itself.
Google SDK has an official emulator for Android. Emulators tend to be coded in the machine assembly language and simulators are coded in high-level languages. Simulators are extremely fast and can give back a result almost immediately.
Unfortunately, neither can be the real thing. The emulator comes closest to recreating the real device. Emulators, though accurate, still are a reflection of the real device in ideal conditions. A real device always has external factors playing in on it. Real devices are still the most accurate ways to determine the working of an app. For example, the temperature of the phone, its age, humidity around the device, apps that are open in the background, etc.
Real devices have their disadvantages too. Debugging with a real device is still very difficult. Debugging is where the emulator champions. Both real device and emulator testing are slower processes giving the win to simulators in a situation where the speed of testing is necessary. For simple applications, simulators should be preferred to both real devices and emulators. Simulators are very cheap in comparison to devices and emulators.
Other features like pop-up notifications, incoming calls, etc. Since the nature of app testing is determined by the type of app being created, certain apps will require special conditional testing capabilities. On a general note, there is a certain path that app testing must follow.
No matter how good the testing goes, the perfect working of an app can never be ensured. Every app no matter how well developed will have shortcomings that will require future maintenance processes, updates, and new features. Similarly, the strategy that is devised for app testing needs to determine which of the three is the best to use.
The right answer would be to use a conjunction of the three. In essence, the perfect testing strategy should use either a simulator or an emulator and also a real device. To simplify, a simulator, or a generalized emulator at the beginning of the development process and real device testing before release. Beta release, however, is an expensive affair. Another problem with beta testing is the amount of time an app needs to be in beta for it to give back valuable feedback.
Time is a luxury for small businesses. Real device testing is also an equally expensive affair. The best path to go if real device testing is expensive for the business, is to use a standardized mobile device for your testing. A standard mobile phone whose quality is neither too good nor too bad should be your benchmark for testing. If deciding on a standard device is hard, use mid-range devices that involve the most unaltered versions of the Android. They work just fine for other configurations. An official emulator for the Android exists in its SDK but external emulators such as BlueStacks are also fairly good.
They do have an official simulator in their SDK kit but a simulator is not good enough. Online emulators emulate Apple to varying degrees of success but they are not true emulators. In conclusion, a combination of simulators during initial development and emulator or real device testing is the perfect path to choose for app testing. A common mistake many app makers make is to keep testing as an external activity for post-development processes but this actually might harm the app. This can be a huge advantage since post-development bugs can be extremely hard and time-consuming to correct.
Keeping testing in the loop ensures that testing is done in real-time and is done feature-by-feature which is sure to be a time-saver. Learn more about App Development with our guide!
Also, avoid long development cycles by making apps without coding. Visit Appy Pie to learn more. Everything that exists on your phone is an app. For the average user, apps are just icons a screen that do exactly what they were made for. An app that appears simple may not be easy to code and vice versa.
App development for smartphones has evolved over the years. It is still a new field which has been around for a measly 2 decades. App development has although evolved exponentially over the years and it has been parallel to the smartphone boom. App development will continue chugging as long as the smartphone industry progresses. The modern app development process has been at a crossroads. The current challenge faced by the app industry is the approach to the development of an app. Based on the development process, there are 3 types of apps: Web apps, Native apps, and Hybrid apps.
Web apps are not used extensively by the smartphone industry anymore. Hence, the debate usually encloses the other two alternatives of app development: Native vs Hybrid. What is a Web App? A web app is an application that works on the server-client model. The default browser of the smartphone acts as the client for a web app. Web apps became hugely popular when HTML5 came out. Web apps are still extremely popular for websites.
Due to overuse of HTML5, distinction between websites and web apps is hard. Web apps face a lot of challenges and security vulnerabilities in their working. Web apps are easy to make and maintain over the other kinds of apps. Web apps can be used and accessed from anywhere. Disadvantages of Web Apps. Less secure since user data is handled by an external client.
However, modern cloud systems are offering higher security to offset this security. It is another debate in itself. Slower than other types of apps. Rely too heavily on Internet connectivity. Some web apps are browser specific. What is a Native app? Native apps are the applications developed for a specific system. Native apps are system-specific and made according to the configuration of a system. Native apps are accessible as icons on a smartphone screen.
Native apps must be developed differently for each operating system. For Android, native apps can be coded in Java. Native apps work by utilizing advancements in smartphone technology and inbuilt systems to their advantage. A good case study for a native app is Pokemon GO. The app which came out in uses your phone hardware, Internet, GPS and camera, combining them in real time to provide an AR experience. Such an experience is hard to provide in other forms of apps.
A native app is essentially in control of its makers. Native apps are the fastest apps on the market. Nothing can effectively beat the speed of a native app. Although some native apps require internet connections, most native apps work offline. Native apps are interactive, intuitive and overall provide the best user experience. They have a high functionality and utilize smartphone utilities to the highest extent. Native apps are downloadable in app stores.
Disadvantages of native apps. Native apps have a lengthy development process. Native apps are expensive to make. Each platform requires separate coders who have enough knowledge about the code. Native apps take a long time to develop and must be built from the ground up. Apps use physical space and memory of a smartphone. Heavier apps may interfere with the functioning of a smartphone.
Though advancement in smartphone technology is making this insignificant. They need to be updated regularly. Hybrid App Development. What is a Hybrid App? Hybrid Apps are an ingenious combination of a web app and a native app. A hybrid app is a downloadable app that works like a web app. It is a prerequisite requirement that the libraries used to develop a hybrid app are the latest available. The code made is wrapped within a framework that creates the native downloadable shell. The most popular frameworks as of today, are Xamarin and PhoneGap.
Hybrid apps are a cross-platform development for smartphones. The best example of a hybrid app is Instagram. The social media giant developed its platform as a hybrid app. What sets Instagram apart is its effective WebView design that is rivalled only by the likes of Twitter. Hybrid apps work on all platforms with a single codebase. Hybrid apps are cheaper than a native app and can be made by coders who are accustomed to building webpages. Hybrid apps are cost-effective solutions that can emulate the experience of a native app.
Can use utilities Geolocation, Camera, Sound systems etc. Disadvantages of hybrid apps. Have a limited customizability. Every step taken towards customizability is just an effective push towards a native solution. Are slower than a native app. Still not as good as native app when it comes to user experience. But with the increasing reliance on smartphones, web apps are being pushed into the background by the smartphone audience. In the current online environment, web apps are being used by people who surf on computers.
When complex coding logic arrives, a web app is practically useless. The dependency on the internet is its greatest pullback. That leaves you with two choices. For a normal business, hybrid apps should be the preferred way to go. Nearly 70 percent of small businesses prefer hybrid apps. Hybrid apps allow you to re-use your resources who created web apps and web pages.
It is the most cost-effective process and allows your app to become downloadable. Being a hybrid app certainly helps your brand, while also serving your purpose as a business. However, hybrid apps have their disadvantages. Hybrid apps have a possibility of being extremely buggy. They suffer from the same bugs as a native and web app while bringing their own set of bugs. Debugging a hybrid app is very hard since you need to review all platforms involved in its development. Hybrid apps are very slow when compared to native apps.
Creating a polished, aesthetically pleasing hybrid app is harder than creating a similar native app. The design of a hybrid app is limited by the framework used for its development. If the long-term goals are concerned native apps are the way to go. A great example for this is Facebook. It began as a hybrid app since it was trying to extend its reach into the smartphone demographic. When the smartphone demographic became significant it switched to a traditional native approach.
This switch can be attributed to both the smartphone boom and to the fact that hybrid apps have limited customizability. Your hybrid app will start hitting limitations in the long run. Hybrid apps are extremely scalable, but they are not traditional apps. If these limitations need to be overcome, you will have to switch to a native app. A simple cost and resource analysis will show that the switch itself will be the same amount as the traditional development of an app.
In the long run, native apps are cheaper. The development might be expensive but native apps are investments that pay off later. They tend to be white elephants for simple businesses. In conclusion, choosing the right type of app comes down to the simple thing: requirement. Most businesses can actually make do with simple hybrid apps. Proper research before development can tell you exactly what type of app you need. Keep in mind, that if the requirement ever comes up, you will need to switch to the native app. Keep provisions for that switch. Learn more about choosing the right process for your app with this video.
But why go through such a hefty development process? Create apps with no coding! Visit Appy Pie to learn more! It is not really news that businesses today need to have a strong online presence and for that building a website is of great importance. The internet and the digital world are evolving continuously and growing at an impressive rate.
With this continuous evolution and growth, things are done a lot differently today with scope for experimentation. The new age customer is not easily impressed. Simply having an online presence is not enough to gain all the benefits that it can bring in. The customers today expect you to keep abreast of the latest trends and if you failed to do so, they are simply going to dismiss you as a brand that is outdated and not relevant today. Now, this is precisely why your web developers need to keep on top of the latest trends pertaining to the web development framework.
You would give you a greater opportunity to stay in sync with the latest developments and the chances of your turnovers sliding down are greatly minimized. Quite popularly referred to, as RoR, Ruby on Rails has emerged as one of the favorites among the web developers today. Since its launch in , RoR is still completely free to use, is open source, and runs on Linux. It is fun to work with and is remarkably quick in getting you through the planning stage and on to the developmental stage. This is one of the more stable frameworks and is ideal to be used for projects that are of a higher complexity.
What makes CakePHP particularly interesting is that the code for all your older projects may be reused through it. This in turn ends up saving the developers a whole lot of time and money by speeding up the whole process of web development. This is probably the most popular framework built by Microsoft and has managed to gain the respect of developers from all over the world. Established in the year , Asp. In fact, a great number of companies from the world over prefer Asp.
It is uncanny how perfectly well it works with real-time applications that have a huge amount of data running through on distributed devices. It has the ability to ensure scalability and fast network applications as they are capable of dealing with multiple applications at the same time without compromising on performance. In it s essence, Yii Framework is strikingly similar to Asp. However, the framework is particularly good in developing applications for systems that need a certain repetitiveness in tasks and follows the Rapid Application Development RAD concept.
If you are looking to take care of the back-end e-commerce web development tools, Laravel is one of the tools that are an absolute must in your toolkit. Since it was first established in , it has only shown great promise by delivering great results for the developers in the world over. An open-source PHP based framework, Laravel is built with the intent of creating only the best quality applications. The framework offers a system that is equipped with a dedicated dependency manager, has an inclination towards syntactic sugar, and helps in the application maintenance and deployment.
The framework lets you create properties out of functions and this feature comes in handy while working with bindings. Ember has a stellar reputation when it comes to creating complicated web apps and has been used by companies like Google, Microsoft, Netflix, and Heroku. Django is a popular framework when it comes to building quality web apps.
The framework was created with the intent of meeting rapidly moving newsroom deadlines while ensuring that they still live up to the demanding requirements of seasoned web developers. Developers favor Django because they find it impressively quick, secure, scalable, and versatile. The language used in the framework is Python and the websites that have been developed using this framework include Disqus, Pinterest, Instagram, and Quora. The framework offers a robust set of features for both, web and mobile applications.
As I mentioned earlier, the framework is relatively minimal, which means that many of the features are available as plugins. The framework is known for speedy development of web applications based on Node. The framework is a critical component of the MEAN software bundle. Coming from Pivotal Software, Spring is the most popular app development framework for enterprise Java. The framework is popular among a huge section of developers globally for creating high performance and strong web apps. The framework is particularly known for creating JVM-based systems and applications that are simple, portable, fast, and flexible.
The framework uses Java and has been used for creating websites like Mascus and Allocine. One of the most popular frameworks used by professional we development services, Flask has managed to establish itself as one of the top and most vigorous web app development frameworks based on Python. This is one of the classic web frameworks for operating web applications through diverse devices and has a Unicode-based maintenance and great documentation.
The core features here including DOM element selections, traversal and manipulation which are further enabled by the selector engine Sizzle has led to the creation of a unique style of programming combining algorithms and DOM data structures. Created by EllisLab, CodeIgniter is a well-known web application framework for building dynamic websites. Loosely based on the MVC architecture, the framework mandates Controller classes, but models and views are optional here.
The platform is quite popular as it promises and delivers exceptional performance, almost zero configuration and massive monolithic libraries. An open-source content management framework, Drupal is available for free. One of the most popular options for developers, Drupal is known to provide the back-end framework for more than 2. Drupal Core comes with the basic features like registration and maintenance of user accounts, menu management, RSS feeds, page layout customization, system administration, taxonomy and more.
Designed initially as a teaching tool, web2py prides itself on being easy to use and deploy. Inspired by the design of frameworks like Ruby on Rails and Django, web2py is known for rapid development, preferring convention over configuration approach while following a model-view-controller or MVC architectural pattern. This framework like many other prominent names on this list is developed around MVC architecture, making the rapid web application development in Python easy and maintainable.
Sinatra, a free, open-source software web application library is written in Ruby and is a great alternative to other web application frameworks written in Ruby, like Ruby on Rails, Merb, Nitro, and Camping. It is small and flexible and does not follow the model-view-controller pattern.
The Mobile Web Surfer - Your Kindle Browser Homepage: Complete Collection ( Kindle Apps #5) eBook: Maria Elizabeth Romana, Michael Barbee: ycimihekin.tk You can download and read online The Mobile Web Surfer - Your Kindle Browser Homepage: Complete Collection (Kindle Apps #5) file PDF Book only if you.
Instead it focuses on rapidly creating web applications in Ruby with least effort. Zend is an object-oriented web framework that is based on agile methodology and was built for development of enterprise-level applications. The framework is known for being characteristically fast, secure, and extendable. It means that this unique web development framework is open for customization. Developers who are planning to look at including some project-specific functions with minimum fuss find Zend to be perfect for them, as the framework adheres to PHP best practices. The framework targets enterprise applications which is why it has features like authentication, services, and even forms.
It has a drag and drop editor to help the developers and has pretty handy coding tools, online debugging tools and a scalable interface which is perfect for creating complicated websites. However, in spite of all these time-saving tools and features Zend is not really considered to be a great rapid web app development framework and that is because it is not among the easiest of the frameworks to learn. An object-oriented web application framework that uses Python programming language, CherryPy is designed specifically for rapid development of web applications.
The framework can act as a web server by itself or can be launched using any WSGI compatible environment. CherryPy does not deal with certain tasks like templating for output rendering or backend access but is extensible with filters. The framework is really fast because it uses only a few resources, and this is really good for developers who work on systems that have low overhead expense.
The great thing about Phalcon is that the framework is updated quite frequently and has been upgraded the right way. It is available for free and is an open-source software under MIT License. The framework makes it easy to create custom, enterprise-grade web apps and APIs. The framework is known for reducing the cognitive burden while swapping between different frameworks and languages.
As it is built on Node. An open-source web application framework Pylons is written in Python programming language. It extensively uses WSGI standard to promote reusability and for separating functionality into separate modules. Pylons is influenced heavily by Ruby on Rails and two of its primary components named Routes and WebHelpers are essentially reimplementations of Railes features in Python. It extends and leverages the Java Servlet API and inspires developers to adopt a model-view-controller architecture.
Written with Java and Scala, Play is considered to be one of the modern web application frameworks. The underlying aim of this framework is to optimize developer productivity by using convention over configuration, hot code reloading and display of errors in the browser. The framework has a provision for adding a voluntary class named the Presenter class between the Controller and view layers. The purpose of this particular class is to hold the logic needed for generating views.
FuelPHP is known for its special attention to security and has some great features like input and URI filtering in addition to output encoding. Some other useful features of the framework include HMVC implementation, URL routing system, caching system, and vulnerability protection. The framework is perfect for delivering end-to-end web solutions of varying size, scope, and complexity.
An open source web app development framework, Grails uses Apache Groovy for programming. The framework is based on MVC pattern architecture and uses controllers to implement web pages behavior. The framework targets developers with experience in Java or Groovy and want to develop web based applications in an integrated development environment and Java developers who are looking for a high productivity environment. As the Grails framework is built atop and is a part of the Java platform it is pretty easy to integrate with Java libraries, frameworks and existing code bases.
The framework is particularly quick, is simple and quite lightweight. Also, Bottle is distributed as a single file module with no dependencies at all except the Python Standard Library. The framework has the ability to run as a standalone web server or with any WSGI supported web server. Mojolicious is an amazing real-time web all development framework which is licensed as a free software and uses Perl for programming. The framework is designed in a way so that it can be effectively used in both, simple and complex web apps.
It has out-of-the-box support for multiple components including RESTful routes, static file server, session management, testing framework, Perl-ish templates, and signed cookies in addition to providing complete Unicode support. A component-based web app framework, Apache Wicket is often called Wicket and uses Java for programming. It comes with some basic built-in features like form, links, repeaters etc. An open source web app framework, Catalyst is written in Perl and is based on MVC pattern architecture and supports multiple experimental web patterns.
It has a built-in HTTP server to help with development and testing. Some of the prominent websites that use Catalyst include Magazines. A free and open source web app framework, Scalatra uses Scala as its programming language and is essentially a port of Sinatra web development framework written in Ruby. It is the perfect example of a microframework which is essentially a web software development framework that strives to be as minimal as possible.
It is in fact possible to write an entire Scalatra application in just a few lines of code. However, Scala can be expanded from this tiny domain specific language to a full-featured MVC web framework. This framework has the potential to be used as an alternative to script. The framework is compatible with and supports Safari 3 and up, Internet Explorer 6 and up, Mozilla Firefox 2 and up, Opera 9 and up, and Chrome 4 and up.
MooTools is extensible and modular in structure, hence lets the developers select combination of components to suit their customized requirements. The framework comes with enhanced DOM which enables the developers to add, edit, select, or delete DOM elements with great ease. The framework has a robust Class creation and inheritance system that is similar to most of the classically based object-oriented programming languages. The library for Wt primarily uses desktop software development process, but it does extend support to a few chosen web specific features like Semantic URLs, navigation of browser history, and more.
Wt is known for its automatic graceful degradation and progressive enhancement and for supporting server-initiated events. It also boasts of robust security features to prevent cross-site scripting and cross-site request forgery events. The framework is known for having a clear separation of presentation and content, input handling and business logic, that follows MVC approach.
The framework also supports progressive rendering of pages, automatic script minification and on-demand lazy loading of client-side script and stylesheet files for faster page loading. An open-source web framework, Grok is based on Zope Toolkit technology. The main intention behind the framework is to make Zope Toolkit more accessible and easier to use for the beginners. It also speeds up application development as per agile programming paradigm. Grok leverages convention over configuration approach instead of using an explicit XML based configuration language. A free, open-source web framework, Yesod is based on Haskell and is great for productive development of type-safe, REST model based, high performance web applications.
A template based framework, Yesod is used to generate instances for listed entities. The great thing about Yesod is that it segregates its functionalities in separate libraries which means that a developer has the liberty to select the functionality library as per their needs and preferences. Like so many other frameworks on this list, Padrino too is a free, open-source framework and is written in Ruby. This Sinatra based framework is a great alternative to other frameworks based on Ruby including Ruby on Rails, Nitro, and Camping.
App Discovery Methods Image via Moz There are two major methods of getting your app discovered: through the app stores and through social sharing. A great example for this is Facebook. DIY application builder like Appy Pie comes along with everything a Church mobile application should have. Check out the difference in the photo below:. But most importantly, can your target audience afford this price?
Padrino is preferred by developers for a number of reasons. The web framework extends full support to multiple prominent testing , prototyping, database and other libraries and is designed in a manner that allows mounting multiple apps. The framework also has a built in Admin interface quite like Django. Quixote is a great software framework for developing web applications using Python as a programming language. The web framework is based on a simple flexible design which allows you to write applications rapidly. Typically, a Quixote app is a Python package, a set of modules grouped into a single directory tree.
Quixote then maps a URL to a function or method within the Python package. This function is called with the contents of the HTTP request and the results are returned to the client. Designed for Scala, Lift is a free and open-sourced web framework. Books will never go out of — out of —.
What about for kids who are maybe preteens and teenagers — that experience of having a book. You remember going to the library? The Dewey decimal system? That whole —. Because, what you can do is you can download your textbooks. And you can have all the books that you need. It would be great for young people. They want —. The whole bookmark industry? But the greatest thing is people are still reading!
And that was the thing. We loved it when we got a new Britannica. What do you think, Bill? I mean — did you hear about this Amish teenager who, uh — who crashed his horse and buggy during a police chase? Come on…. Come on! Come on, Christa, come on! And of course, Barbara Walters put it all into perspective. Larry Rosen wrote an interesting article for Psychology Today. I have to agree.
And they only made it to America because they built two new ships while shipwrecked? And that may have inspired Shakespeare to write The Tempest? And I think this whole debate can be summed up by two brilliant sentences from author David Weinberger. And yesterday Dr. Click here for the Kindle version of Dr. I remembered being a teenager and watching an old black-and-white horror movie from the s — I think it was The Invisible Man Returns — but what really impressed me was the elderly British inspector in the movie who had his own cozy den that was filled with shelves of books.
I remember thinking that when I was a grown-up, I also wanted a luxuriously cozy study just like that — which would also be lined with my favorite books. But now, instead, I have my Kindle, which can probably hold just as many books. But is the luxurious library itself going to become a think of the past? It could have a special custom case — marble, maybe, or solid gold. Or maybe books will be still be collected, but as exotic antiquities from a bygone age….
For example, he once lived at a place called University House. The water poured down the roof and collected in an exposed gutter which hurried it along somewhere downhill. I have long had this peculiar love of sitting very close to the rain and yet remaining protected — in a cafe, on a porch, next to a window, or there in that room, which had two iron-paned windows and a Dutch door. I love reading on a rainy day, too, curled up in my cozy chair with a very good…ebook. By then my reading level had advanced to the point where I was reading real novels like The Count of Monte Cristo ….
He hid it in his room which was, of course, completely off limits to his little sister. I am now able to confess this crime — I went into the forbidden room, found the concealed Sherlock Holmes collection — and pilfered it! What joy! Sir Arthur Conan Doyle is a great writer and crafter of stories. Intricate, detailed situations with flawed characters, gripping plot lines and very surprising endings. And Doyle himself led a very intriguing life. So while he waited for his patients, he wrote his first mysteries. The likeness was so good that Wikipedia says Robert Louis Stevenson another Scotsman, then living in Samoa recognized the professor and mentioned it in his letter of congratulations to Sir Doyle.
Then I started reading other mystery novels and found I could solve them as I read along. Then I rediscovered Sherlock Holmes on my Kindle! There are over 50 Holmes stories. There was the wonderful writing, the fascinating plots, the twisting and turning, and such a wonderful read every time. And his friend Dr. Watson was always sharing my cluelessness.
I found that I remembered the stories, but often not the ending and as I read. How frustrating! I had been excited to approach these stories with my new adult mystery-solving abilites. Then I realized there is no way to solve a Sherlock Holmes crime! Holmes comes up with some puzzle piece so completely out of left field that could never have figured it out. It was the specific type of cigar ash, Watson. Oh, oops, silly me for forgetting the monograph! Which, by the way, was never available to us non-fictitious mortals…. Note to Sir A. Conon Doyle: Write the damn monograph or quit using it as the only way to solve the mystery!
And Amazon has a thriving community of Kindle users sharing information in their Kindle discussion forums. I once interviewed Roger Ebert back in After all, he was a newsman and a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist. Spoken like a newsman. Although to be fair, Ebert has always spent a lot of time surfing the web, and acknowledged that those tiny screens and tinier keyboards were also driving him crazy.
And he was even more sensitive to the keyboard problems because — guess what? And, of course, his love for books helps explain the depth of his thinking and his writing. This is a blog primarily about business books. But underlying it is a simple love of books. Roger Ebert has given us a great read to remind us about our own love for books. I was a little confused by the format of the blog post, but at the end Ebert seemed to approvingly quote a year-old reader in Arizona who had a humorous observation of her own.
It was in a fairly technical essay where Ebert explained why he prefers seeing films in celluloid prints vs. I miss radio drama. In some matters, I feel almost like a reactionary. I love books, for example. Physical books with pages, bindings, tactile qualities and even smell. Still as curiously pungent as ever. I summarily reject any opportunity to read a book by digital means, no matter how fervently Andy Ihnatko praises his Kindle. Somehow a Kindle sounds like it would be useful for the wood-burning cinema. The wry resistance of my hero left me a little stunned, until I realized that the two of us also shared a tremendous common ground.
Therefore, we cannot remove the items from the Kindle Community tag from our site. I apologize if this causes you any frustration. But apparently earlier this week a bunch of erotic novels were released for free, which gave them a surge of popularity and helped them start appearing in the automatically generated lists. Which puts in the top ten percent. Another user even argued that protecting the impressionable was best left to the users themselves.
Children are only supposed to be accessing Amazon under parental guidance. If people follow the terms, children only see what adults allow them to see. The Lolcats!